01 / 13 Intelligence. Evidence. Cooperation. An independent research initiative.
02 / 13 What can we know, and how can we check it? Exploring AI, consciousness, identity and human cooperation through accessible reviews of published knowledge.
Current stage: literature synthesis and collaboration development.
03 / 13 Seven programmes, three reading paths Reliable knowledge · Mind & identity · Human cooperation.
The groups provide navigation. Each programme retains its own questions and evidence standards.
04 / 13 Reliable knowledge Reliable AI research: citation support, research agents and evaluation limits.
Learning from verified results: training signals, process checks and synthetic data.
No model-performance improvement is claimed.
05 / 13 Mind and identity Consciousness & measurement: theories, indicators and limits of interpretation.
Digital continuity: memory, neural structure and the difference between a model and a person.
No consciousness transfer or digital immortality result is claimed.
06 / 13 Human cooperation Religion, ritual & cooperation · Voluntary coordination · Philosophy & meaning.
Local findings require context. Philosophical arguments and empirical results remain distinct.
07 / 13 The public research foundation 7 programmes · 21 literature reviews · PDF + Markdown.
One overview and two focused reviews per programme, with source references, objections and explicit limits.
08 / 13 What the current work establishes Published literature syntheses Programme and reading catalogues References and source-access notes A public route for corrections No external scientific peer review or original experiments are claimed.
09 / 13 People, AI and research People set questions, assess claims and take responsibility for decisions.
AI assistance supports finding, comparing and drafting material. Outputs still need scrutiny.
Experiments are a proposed next stage with agreed protocols and qualified collaborators.
10 / 13 A first joint project: claim review Choose one review and 20 jointly selected claims. Use two independent reviewers. Resolve disagreements explicitly.
Output: source passages, support ratings, corrections and a short English summary.
11 / 13 A concrete contribution for each partner Researchers — independent claim review.
12 / 13 The next proof of progress 01 Agree one question.
Completion criterion: every sampled claim has evidence and a disposition. A negative result is valid.
13 / 13 What is one question we could examine together? Start with a bounded, checkable collaboration.
← Previous 1 / 13 Next →